Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Polk v. Johnson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1970No. 266PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The issue is:

Did the trial court err in directing a verdict for the defendant after excusing a juror for cause?

A capsule resumé of the evidence may be helpful in reviewing the trial court’s orders and judgment.

The testimony of the complainant reveals she bore a child out of wedlock January 5, 1968. She testified the only person with whom she had sexual intercourse during the period of conception was the defendant, Charles Johnson. Johnson was married, the father of five children, but was separated from his wife. The complainant stated she had been seeing the defendant steadily since August,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. OlcottNew York Supreme Court · 1801
  2. Frion v. CraigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. EllisNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  4. Planer v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Adams v. SnowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LehmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lobermeier v. General Tel. Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Waldman v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Commonwealth vs. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API