Legal Opinion

P.C. v. C.C.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 1, 1989No. 88-2022Published

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

P.C. and J.H. appeal an order dismissing a custody action on the basis the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. The issue is whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel bars the relitigation of the jurisdiction question because the circuit court earlier determined that it had subject matter jurisdiction in a guardianship action and a termination of parental rights (TPR) action involving the same parties. We conclude that collateral estoppel does not bar relitigation, and we affirm the order of dismissal.

A.E.H. was born to C.C. and H.H. in California on August 2, 1983. The father and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. E. E. B. v. D. A.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Prentice v. County Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In re Guardianship of WonderlyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API