Legal Opinion

People v. Einhorn

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1974PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

A Grand Jury witness need not answer questions based on information obtained as the result of illegal wiretapping (U. S. Code, tit. 18, § 2515). Nor may the contempt power be used to compel such testimony or punish the witness for his silence. The claim ,of illegal wiretapping, if sustained, constitutes a defense.

However, when the witness raises the objection, during the Grand Jury proceeding, unless he requests to be brought before the court, the prosecutor is not 'obligated to affirm or deny the underlying facts.*

The request during the Grand Jury proceeding by the witness that he be brought…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. McGrathNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Santangello v. PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. DercoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Democratic County Committee v. NadjariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. People v. SmaysNew York Supreme Court · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API