Legal Opinion

In re Enhanced Recovery Co.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 2, 2016No. MDL No. 2717PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

Sarah S. Vance, Chair

Before the Panel:* Plaintiff in an action pending in the Southern District of Florida moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize pretrial proceedings in this litigation in the. Central District of California or, alternatively, in the Southern District of- Florida. This litigation consists of four actions— two actions pending in the Central District of California and one action each in the Eastern District of California and the Southern District of Florida — as listed on Schedule A,1 All the responding parties support centralization, but disagree as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Transocean Ltd. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  2. In re Lifewatch, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
  3. In re Enhanced Recovery Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Enhanced Recovery Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API