Legal Opinion

Richard St. Paul v. Hon. Nilda Morales-Horowitz, et al.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 15, 2026No. 7:25-cv-04317Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD ST. PAUL, Plaintiff, -against- 25-CV-4317 (JGLC) HON. NILDA MORALES-HOROWITZ, et al., OPINION AND ORDER Defendants. JESSICA G. L. CLARKE, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Richard St. Paul, a practicing attorney appearing pro se, brings this

24 U.S.C. § 1983

action against four individual judges, the Westchester County Family Court, and the New York State Unified Court System (“UCS”). Plaintiff brings due process, denial of right to an impartial tribunal, and retaliation claims arising from his four-day incarceration for…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API