Baez v. The Hill at Whitemarsh
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANA BAEZ, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION THE HILL AT WHITEMARSH, No. 20-5989 Defendant : PRATTE MEMORANDUM /{ R, J. JANUARY / |, 2022 Ana Baez contends that her employer, The Hill at Whitemarsh (“The Hill”), unlawfully terminated her employment based on her national origin. The Hill filed a motion for summary judgment, claiming that Ms. Baez has not established a prima facie case of national origin discrimination and cannot show that The Hill’s reason for terminating her employment—failure to pass an English proficiency…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Makky v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.