Legal Opinion

Baez v. The Hill at Whitemarsh

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2022No. 2:20-cv-05989Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANA BAEZ, : Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION THE HILL AT WHITEMARSH, No. 20-5989 Defendant : PRATTE MEMORANDUM /{ R, J. JANUARY / |, 2022 Ana Baez contends that her employer, The Hill at Whitemarsh (“The Hill”), unlawfully terminated her employment based on her national origin. The Hill filed a motion for summary judgment, claiming that Ms. Baez has not established a prima facie case of national origin discrimination and cannot show that The Hill’s reason for terminating her employment—failure to pass an English proficiency…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Makky v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API