Legal Opinion

Greiner v. Bank of Adelaide

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCook, J.

Defendant moves to vacate a warrant of attachment on the ground that it is a foreign corporation and the plaintiff a non-resident. (Gen. Corp. Law, § 225.)

Section 224 of the General Corporation Law reads as follows:

“ § 224. Action against foreign corporation. An action against a foreign corporation may be maintained by a resident of the State, or by a domestic corporation, for any cause of action.” It is conceded that the defendant is an Australian banking corporation with a branch office in England. The subject-matter of the suit is an alleged letter of credit issued in London on February…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gosschalk v. GosschalkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Schwartz v. Zim Israel Navigation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Townsend v. TownsendNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Taubenfeld v. TaubenfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Gosschalk v. GosschalkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API