Beaver Pipe Tools, Inc. v. Carey
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
These suits are to recover excess profit taxes claimed to have been assessed and collected erroneously. They were commenced following the Commissioner’s rejection of refunds applied for covering certain taxable years.
Hearing was had in open court upon the pleadings, statements of counsel, stipulations of the parties, limited oral testimony, and the matters were submitted upon briefs.
The facts are not in substantial or controlling dispute and since the parties are familiar with them, no extensive recitation is thought necessary here.
By voluntary action the owners of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HP Hood & SonsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Brown-Rogers-Dixson Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Preston v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Jordan Co. v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1949
3Cited by2 opinions
- P. M. Finance Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Farley Realty Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960