Ex parte White
Nevada Supreme Court
Habeas corpus before the Supreme Court The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Hawley, J.:
The return to the writ of habeas corpus, issued in this case, shows that petitioners were arrested and brought before a justice of the-peace on the first day of February, 1880, on a charge of having committed a misdemeanor. In answer to questions asked them by the justice they stated that they did not desire counsel. They plead guilty, and Avaived the time prescribed by statute for passing sentence. The justice thereupon, on said first day of February, passed sentence, and rendered judgment imposing a fine and imprisonment. The first day of February was Sunday.
Was the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pearce v. AtwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Chapman v. State ex rel. ConerleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
- Hemmens v. BentleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ex parte TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894
- Hovey v. SheffnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
- Styles v. HarrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- New Castle v. Casacchia, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County1946