Legal Opinion

Allied-Signal v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 6, 1992No. Docket Nos. 9662-89, 17584-89Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO ALLIED CORPORATION (FORMERLY ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION), Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Allied-Signal v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 9662-89, 17584-89.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-204; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 241; 63 T.C.M. (CCH) 2672;

April 6, 1992, Filed

Decisions will be entered under Rule 155.

Richard G. Fishman, James G. Wells, Ronald A. Sinaikin, Mac Asbill, Jr., Padric K. J. O'Brien, and Jerome B. Libin, for petitioner.

Janet Engel Kidd, for respondent.

PARKER

PARKER

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

PARKER,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Hernandez v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Chandler v. Warden FretagSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Commissioner v. TellierSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API