Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Alengi

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2005No. 02CA0832Published

1Dissent

Judge DAILEY

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent.

“Of all the rights that an accused person has, the right to be represented by counsel is by far the most pervasive for it affects his ability to assert any other rights he may have.” United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 654, 104 S.Ct. 2039, 2044, 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984)(quoting Schaefer, Federalism and State Criminal Procedure, 70 Harv. L.Rev. 1, 8 (1956)).

“ ‘[F]orcing a criminal defendant to go to trial pro se’ without conducting an appropriate inquiry into his financial ability to afford counsel ‘constitutes a denial of [a] defendant’s sixth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. ArguelloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. United States v. Anthony Robert Martin-TrigonaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. John L. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. King v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API