State v. Melanson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Dissent
Murray, A. R. J.,
Dissenting
The majority opinion in this case, which we shall hereafter refer to as the opinion, has decided it upon the merits. With its contention that it has jurisdiction to do so we cannot concur.
Our contention is that the case is not in this court legally, therefore, not here at all, and all that this court can do is dismiss it from the docket for want of jurisdiction.
Following is the record of the lower court:
1955 Nov. T 2 Defendant’s plea filed. State’s demurrer to plea filed. Respondent’s joinder filed. Demurrer to plea sustained. Respondent to plead over.
1955 Nov. T 8…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- Jenness v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
- State v. InnessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
- Hutchins v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- State v. StickneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.