Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1972No. KCD 26113PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASSERSTROM, Judge.

From a conviction of burglary in the second degree and burglarious stealing under § 560.110 V.A.M.S., with resulting consecutive sentences of three years on the burglary and two years on the stealing, the defendant appeals. He attacks the sufficiency of the information and also the admissibility of certain evidence. Since we sustain the attack on the information, it is unnecessary to consider the evidentiary points. Those are no longer live issues and any discussion thereof “would amount to nothing more than obiter dictum”. State v. Cunningham, Mo., 380 S.W.2d 401, 1. c.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. ZammarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. State v. ClineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. BarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. City of Kansas v. HarbinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. State v. BarnesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API