Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 12, 1928No. A-6203PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction rendered on the verdict of a jury finding the defendant guilty of grand larceny and leaving his punishment to be fixed by the court. Motion for new' trial was duly filed and overruled, and on the 3d day of November, 1925, the court sentenced the defendant to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 2y2 years.

The information charges that the defendant, Hubert Smith, on or about the 10th day of February, 1925, did take, steal, and carry away a certain set of heavy leather work harness, of the value of $66, the personal property of L. R.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. RuleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brewer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Drew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API