Legal Opinion

Twist Architecture & Design, Inc. v. Oregon Board of Architect Examiners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 24, 2016No. 10035; A152929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

Twist Architecture & Design, Inc. (Twist), and its principals, Kirk Callison and David Hansen, seek judicial review of a final order of the Oregon Board of Architect Examiners (board) imposing a $10,000 civil penalty against each for the unlawful practice of architecture under ORS 671.020(1) and (4), and OAR 806-010-0037(7).1 Following a contested case hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ), the board determined that petitioners had violated that statute and rule. The board found violations as a result of (1) Twist’s preparation of three feasibility studies in Oregon, (2) its use of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ross v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Twist Architecture & Design, Inc. v. Oregon Board of Architect ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API