Legal Opinion

Berry v. Kingsbaker

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 10, 1905No. Gen. No. 11,509Published

Action of assumpsit, Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

If the defendant had filed with his special plea of usury a plea of set-off he would have had the right to offer evidence to prove the sét-off as well as the usury, but he could not make the defense of usury under a special plea and give evidence to prove a set-off under a notice of special matter. He gave evidence in support of his plea of usury and thereby waived his notice of set-off. Wyatt v. Dufrene, 106 Ill. App. 214, and cases there cited.

Ho doubt where a note is giveji in renewal of another note, upon a proper plea, usury…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wyatt v. DufreneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API