Legal Opinion
Schanerman v. Everett and Carbin, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 26, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jacobs, J.
The Appellate Division, with one judge dissenting, reversed the judgment for plaintiff entered pursuant to a verdict by the jury in his favor. See 18 N. J. Super. 248 (1952). The plaintiff has duly appealed to this court under Rule 1:2 — 1.
The defendant, Everett and Carbin, Inc., a licensed real estate broker, was engaged by the Prudential' Insurance Company to effect the sale of property located at 22 Lexington Avenue, Jersey City. An offer of $90,000 was received and accepted and a contract was executed and assigned to the purchaser G. M.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Dotson v. MillikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- McFarland v. LillardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Stanton v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Stokes v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jack A. Rainier, in No. 13337 v. Champion Container Company, Irwin R. Weiner, in No. 13338, Ira Earl Robinson and Harry A. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- The COLONIAL LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA v. MazurNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. DANTE L. ALEXANDER (15-01-0104, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020