Legal Opinion

McCaddin v. McCaddin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 5, 1911PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (StockbrIdge, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.

This is an appeal from a decree allowing the appellee seven dollars and fifty cents per week as permanent alimony and also counsel fees. The bill does not pray for a divorce, but only for temporary, alimony, pendente lite, permanent alimony and counsel fees. There is no question in this State about the power of a Court of Chancery to entertain an application by a wife against her husband for alimony, although she does not ask for a decree of divorce. As recently as Taylor v. Taylor, 108 Md. 129, such a suit was entertained, and there are a number of other decisions by us and our predecessors,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallingsford v. WallingsfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1825
  2. Chappell v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  4. Taylor v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Dickey v. DickeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  2. Hood v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  3. Horsey v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Blades v. SzataiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  5. Winkel v. WinkelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API