Legal Opinion

Telephone Co. v. Turner

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1889PublishedCited by 15 opinions

PROM SUMNER. Appeal in erroi’ from Circuit Court of Sumner County. A. H. Munpord, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.

Plaintiff in error is a foreign corporation, doing business in this and other States. Among other lines, it has one in the city of Gal-latin, and a line extending from that' place to Scottsville, Ky. It was sued in the Circuit Court of Sumner County, upon a cause of action originating in that county, for injuries sustained by reason of alleged negligence in the care and main*267tenance of their line of wire in that county. The company has an office in Gallatin and a. local resident agent. Process was served upon this local agent, the return showing that neither the President, Cashier, Treasurer,…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. W. D. Lawson & Company and Washington General Insurance Company v. Penn Central Company and Fort Worth & Denver Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. Guthrie v. Indemnity Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n v. Cleveland Woolen MillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  4. Gillis v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
  5. Alwood v. Buffalo Hardwood Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API