Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scalo v. Mandanici

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 18, 1979Published

1DissentBogdanski, J.

For this court to uphold the ordinance granting the instant pay raises is in direct violation of article eleventh, § 2 of our state constitution and contrary to public policy.

It is undisputed that the various defendants are either elected or politically appointed officials of the city of Bridgeport. Article eleventh, § 2 of the constitution of the state of Connecticut provides in clear and unequivocal language that “[n] either the general assembly nor any county, city, borough, town or school district shall have power to . . . increase the compensation of any public officer or employee, to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garvie v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  2. Smith v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
  3. Wright v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API