Scalo v. Mandanici
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentBogdanski, J.
For this court to uphold the ordinance granting the instant pay raises is in direct violation of article eleventh, § 2 of our state constitution and contrary to public policy.
It is undisputed that the various defendants are either elected or politically appointed officials of the city of Bridgeport. Article eleventh, § 2 of the constitution of the state of Connecticut provides in clear and unequivocal language that “[n] either the general assembly nor any county, city, borough, town or school district shall have power to . . . increase the compensation of any public officer or employee, to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Garvie v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Smith v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Wright v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883