Legal Opinion

Rush v. Ray

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1985No. 83-1191PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

In this appeal a legislator challenges the legality of the Governor’s action exercising his item veto power. The basic issue is whether use of the governor’s item veto power to eliminate a provision in an appropriation bill which prohibits the expenditure or transfer of appropriated funds from one department of state government to another is proper. The trial court held that such a veto is proper. We conclude such a provision is a qualification or limitation on the appropriation, rather than an item, and reverse.

During the 68th session of the Iowa General Assembly, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. DodsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Fulmore v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Turner v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Welden v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rants v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Colton v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. In the Interest of C.S.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Alaska Legislative Council v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. N.D. Legislative Assembly v. BurgumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API