Rush v. Ray
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHULTZ, Justice.
In this appeal a legislator challenges the legality of the Governor’s action exercising his item veto power. The basic issue is whether use of the governor’s item veto power to eliminate a provision in an appropriation bill which prohibits the expenditure or transfer of appropriated funds from one department of state government to another is proper. The trial court held that such a veto is proper. We conclude such a provision is a qualification or limitation on the appropriation, rather than an item, and reverse.
During the 68th session of the Iowa General Assembly, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DodsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Fulmore v. LaneTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Welden v. RaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rants v. VilsackSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Colton v. BranstadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- In the Interest of C.S.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Alaska Legislative Council v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- N.D. Legislative Assembly v. BurgumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.