Legal Opinion
Membres v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2008No. 49S02-0701-CR-33Published
1Opinion of the Court
889 N.E.2d 265 (2008)
George MEMBRES III, Appellant (Defendant below),
v.
STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below).
No. 49S02-0701-CR-33.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
June 27, 2008.
Robert W. Hammerle, Steven D. Allen, Joseph M. Cleary, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellant.
Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, J.T. Whitehead, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
BOEHM, Justice.
We hold that Litchfield v. State, 824 N.E.2d 356 (Ind.2005), does not apply retroactively because it established a new rule of state criminal procedure that does not affect the…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.