Legal Opinion

Kaw Nation v. Springer

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2003No. 02-6169PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant, Kaw Nation, appeals the dismissal of its complaint from federal district court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The tribe attempted to bring suit in district court against its former officials and other individuals under a federal criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1163, but failed to establish that a private cause of action existed under the statute. On appeal, the tribe reasserts its argument for a private civil cause of action in the criminal statute, and proffers for the first time an alternate basis of jurisdiction in the Native American…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Elder v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bliss v. FrancoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Hill v. DidioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Kaw Nation Ex Rel. McCauley v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. McKay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. Oglala Sioux Tribe v. SchwartingDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API