Legal Opinion
Alridge v. G4s Secure Solutions
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 8, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2019-1360Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTNEY T. ALRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1360 (JEB) G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS USA, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States Secret Service denied pro se Plaintiff Courtney Alridge’s job application, and he believes that he knows why: his previous employer, Defendant G4S Secure Solutions, disclosed to the U.S.S.S. that it had previously suspended him. The problem? Alridge claims he was never suspended and that this representation was false and defamatory. As a result, Alridge filed a tort action against G4S in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Randy Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Luise Light v. Isabel WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.