Legal Opinion

Howard v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1957No. 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellant was convicted of making an indecent sexual proposal and sentenced to 360 days in jail. He has appealed alleging that (1) the failure of the trial court to quash the arrest and dismiss the information constituted error, (2) there was insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, and (3) the sentence imposed was in excess of the maximum permitted under the statute.

The motion to quash was based on the contention that the police officer, who made the arrest without a warrant, had no basis to conclude that a criminal offense had been committed in his presence.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. George T. Jordan v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia, George T. Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Meyers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Davenport v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. United States v. LaffalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. PerryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. District of Columbia v. GarciaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. District of Columbia v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. State v. NolanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. State v. KeatingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API