Bergman & Berry v. Twilight
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Clatsop County. Tlie facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Lord, J.:
This is an action for the wrongful taking and conversion by the defendant of certain personal property of the plaintiffs. The defendant admits the taking, denies the ownership of plaintiffs, and justifies under an execution issued, &c., in favor of E. J. Ingalls v. E. S. Cottrell, and further alleges, in substance, that the said property was the property of Cottrell, and not the property of plaintiffs, and that the same was taken and sold under execution against the said Cottrell. The reply of plaintiffs denies all allegations in the defendant’s answer, and sets up a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Elliott v. StoddardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ammon v. JohnsonCuyahoga Circuit Court · 1888
- Johnston v. SpoonheimNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909