Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
The Suggestions For Rehearing En Banc and appellant’s response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular, active service voted in favor of the suggestions. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestions are granted and this case will be considered and decided by the Court sitting en banc. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the judgment of the panel filed on April 30, 1991, 931 F.2d 939 be, and the same hereby is, vacated.
A future order will govern…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and Institute for Nuclear Power OperationsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
4Cited by2 opinions
- Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992