Legal Opinion
Anderson v. FARM SERVICE AGENCY
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 8, 2007No. Civil 06-1945 ADM/AJBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
L INTRODUCTION
On April 6, 2007, oral argument before the undersigned United States District Judge was heard on Plaintiff Harlan Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 24], For the reasons set forth herein, Anderson’s Motion is denied and judgment is entered for Defendant Farm Service Agency (“FSA”) of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). '
II. BACKGROUND
In the Agricultural Assistance Act of 2003 (“the Act”), Congress directed the Secretary of Agriculture to provide funds from the Commodity Credit…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Schweiker v. McClureSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ronald Eugene Henry v. United States Department of the Navy, Secretary of the Navy, and Board for Correction of Naval RecordsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anderson v. Farm Service Agency of United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Harlan Anderson v. Farm Service AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008