Legal Opinion

Lockhart v. Loosen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 21, 1997No. 86836Published

1Opinion of the Court

943 P.2d 1074 (1997)

1997 OK 103

Teresa LOCKHART, Appellant,

v.

Marette LOOSEN, Appellee.

No. 86836.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 15, 1997.

As Corrected August 21, 1997.

Michael E. Smith, of Barnes, Smith & Lewis, P.C., Oklahoma City, for Appellant.

Daniel J. Hoehner, of Chubbuck, Bullard & Hoehner, Oklahoma City, for Appellee.

LAVENDER, Justice.

¶ 1 Dispositive of Loosen's appeal is whether there are factual issues which should have been resolved by the trier of fact before it dismissed her claim with prejudice. Application of traditional common-law principles of causation require that Lockhart's…

Also in this document: Dissent · Opala; Concurrence; Dissent · Simms.

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. Meany v. MeanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API