Legal Opinion

Kent Construction Co. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

The claimant, in the year 1919, entered into a contract with the State of New York whereby it agreed to resurface four and ninety-three one-hundredths miles of a highway, known as the Delhi-Middletown county highway, in the county of Delaware. The claimant performed its contract and received a sum of money representing the contract total as modified by a supplemental agreement. It then filed this claim for a sum of money in excess of the contract total as modified. The claimant demands a recovery for damages alleged to have been caused by the resurfacing of the highway in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gearty v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
  2. Sorrentino v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. Michael v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API