Legal Opinion

In re Amerisure Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 2000No. 10-00-354-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Mnerisure Insurance Company petitions this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against Respondent, the Honorable Ralph Strother, Judge of the 19th District Court of McLennan County. However, the mandamus record provided by Amerisure reflects that the Honorable Bill Logue presided over the hearing in which Amerisure sought to compel the real party in interest to submit to a medical examination under Rule of Civil Procedure 204. Judge Logue signed the order denying Amerisure’s motion. Amerisure has failed to name the proper respondent. We deny the petition.1 See Jampole v. Touchy, 673…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gaal v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pelt v. Johnson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1991
  4. City of Beaumont v. StephensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API