Succession of Dean
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBonin, J.
hlf I were required to reach the issue of the decedent’s testamentary intent, I would concur with the Majority Opinion, as I explain in Part 2. But because I find clear error with the trial judge’s resolution that the proponent of the purported testament overcame the presumption that the lost original will was revoked by its destruction, I respectfully dissent from the Majority Opinion in that respect and explain my view in Part 1.
1
The critical inquiry in this case is whether Mrs. Dean, the proponent of probating the copy of a will, had the burden of showing by clear and convincing evidence *533th…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Succession of NunleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Succession of TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Succession of GuerreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Succession of DancieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Jarel v. Moon's SuccessionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.