Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Succession of Dean

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 2013No. 2012-CA-0832Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBonin, J.

hlf I were required to reach the issue of the decedent’s testamentary intent, I would concur with the Majority Opinion, as I explain in Part 2. But because I find clear error with the trial judge’s resolution that the proponent of the purported testament overcame the presumption that the lost original will was revoked by its destruction, I respectfully dissent from the Majority Opinion in that respect and explain my view in Part 1.

1

The critical inquiry in this case is whether Mrs. Dean, the proponent of probating the copy of a will, had the burden of showing by clear and convincing evidence *533th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Succession of NunleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Succession of TalbotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
  3. Succession of GuerreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Succession of DancieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  5. Jarel v. Moon's SuccessionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API