Legal Opinion

Claim of Karl v. New Venture Gear

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCardona, P.J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 1, 2006, which ruled that the employer was entitled to reimbursement for certain benefits paid to claimant.

Claimant, an administrative assistant, filed a workers’ compensation claim in September 2003 after experiencing bilateral hand and wrist tingling and numbness due to her typing duties at work. The self-insured employer did not dispute the claim and notified the Workers’ Compensation Board in September 2003 that payment of workers’ compensation benefits in the amount of $400 a week had begun. In addition, the employer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Groth v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Claim of Poveromo v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Claim of Pratt v. Pratt Plumbing & HeatingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Groth v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Matter of O'Brien v. Albany County Sheriff's DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. MatterofDobneyvEastmanKodakCompanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API