Legal Opinion

Home Bank for Savings v. Lohm

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1915No. 1339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition to Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Law, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg, in Bankruptcy; Alston G. Dayton, Judge. In the matter of Wilhelmina Wittigschlager, bankrupt; A. L. Lohm, trustee. On petition by the Home Bank for Savings to superintend and revise.

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.

This is a petition to superintend and revise, in matter of law, proceedings in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia. It appears *634that on the 21st day of May, 1913, the Home Bank for Savings instituted a suit in debt in the circuit court of Harrison county, W. Va., against Wilhelmina Wittigschlager, and on the 22d day of May, 1913, the bank procured an attachment in such action, which was duly' levied upon the goods of Wilhelmina Wittigschlager. Thereafter, on the 12th day of August, 1913, on the petition of three creditors,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coder v. ArtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. In re RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899
  3. Cook v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Piano Co. v. HeazelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  2. Luck v. StaplesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API