Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hughes v. McNabb

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1933No. 3855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINN, Justice.

Appellees were granted a writ of mandamus against appellant as acting state comptroller, commanding him to give appellees access to certain records in his office that they may be informed of the amounts of gasoline taxes paid by each individual, corporation, firm, or association in the state engaged in the-gasoline business.

The question for decision herein is whether, pursuant to 1929 Comp. St. § 60-212, the records, books, papers, and returns of taxpayers of the gasoline excise tax, in the hands of the acting state comptroller, are public records-subject to inspection 'by any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bd. Com. Bern. Co. v. Coors, Co. Ch.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gunaji v. MacIasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rossiter v. BenoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. New Mexico Bus Sales v. MichaelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Appelman v. BeachNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Hatch v. KeehanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API