Legal Opinion

Hartman v. New Jersey Racing Commission

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 2, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

Three owners of race horses appeal from a final determination of the New Jersey Racing Commission requiring them to return purse monies won by their horses that were under the supervision of a trainer who, unknown to them during that time, was under a *492suspension in New York State and, thus, held to be ineligible to participate in the races in New Jersey.

The New Jersey Racing Commission (Commission) on March 22, 2001, required the owners of the affected horses, Leonardis, Lawton, and Hartman (owners) to return purse monies won by their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Vitis v. New Jersey Racing Com'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. In Re Petition of Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  3. Dare v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  4. Moiseyev v. NEW JERSEY RACING COM'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. City of Philadelphia v. WheelerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API