Legal Opinion
Magnetar Technologies Corp. v. Six Flags Theme Park Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 22, 2012No. C.A. No. 07-127-LPS-MPTPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARY PAT THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On March 1, 2007, plaintiffs Safety Breaking Corporation (“SBC”), Magnetar Technologies Corporation (“Magnetar”) *472and G & T Conveyor Corporation (“G & T”) filed this action against defendants, a series of amusement park owners and operators (“Six Flags”),1 for patent infringement.2 The patent at issue, U.S. Patent No. 5,277,125 (“'125 patent”), was originally assigned to BAE Automated Systems (“BAE”).3 G & T acquired the assets of BAE in 2001.4 Magnetar received an exclusive license under the '125 patent from G & T…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- G. BouSamra, M.D. v. Excela Health, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- ZVI Construction Co., LLC v. LevyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2016
- Greenberger v. Internal Revenue Serv.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Brown v. West Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.