Legal Opinion

United States v. McClendon

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 12, 2004No. 02-2021PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

James McClendon, charged as a felon in possession of a firearm, filed a motion to suppress evidence found during the warrantless search of his satchel, arguing that the search violated the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. The district court agreed, and suppressed the evidence. The Government now appeals the district court’s order suppressing the evidence obtained from the search of the satchel. We affirm the order of the district court, as the search of the satchel violated McClendon’s Fourth Amendment rights.

I. Background

On June…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United States v. Jessie Lee WaldonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Carless Jones and Eugene HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Harold McRaeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Richard S. OswaldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  2. United States v. DomenechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Lawson v. CreelyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  4. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. United States v. DomenechCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API