Vernon v. Closets by Design Inc
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 CORLIS VERNON, CASE NO. 2:23-cv-1180-JNW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 9 TO DISMISS v. 10 CLOSETS BY DESIGN, INC. and CBD 11 FRANCHISING, INC., 12 Defendants. 13 1. INTRODUCTION 14 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Closets by Design, Inc. 15 (“CBD”) and CBD Franchising, Inc.’s (“CBDF”) motion to dismiss for lack of 16 personal jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 27. After reviewing the briefing, the record, and the 17 law, the Court finds oral argument unnecessary. Because the Court finds that it…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.