Legal Opinion

Ghitescu v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1973No. Cong. No. 1-70PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*826Opinion

By the Review Panel:

By H. Res. 324, 91st Cong., 1st Sess., approved February 17,1970, the Blouse of Representatives referred to the Chief Commissioner of the Court of Claims, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1492 and 2509 (1970), H.R. 8568, 91st Cong., 1st Sess., a bill for the relief of the heirs of Amadeu Ghitescu, “for further proceedings in accordance with applicable law.” The Chief Commissioner referred the case to Trial Commissioner David Schwartz for proceedings in accordance with the applicable rules, and designated the above-named members of the Review Panel to consider Commissioner…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Honda v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Burkhardt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  4. Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Todd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. California Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  2. Amick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Phillips v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  4. Eriez Magnetics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Merchants National Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API