Legal Opinion

Banzer v. Banzer

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided October 15, 1894Published

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

In a suit for partition the case is this : John Maier and Michal Banzer were tenants in common ; Maier conveyed his undivided moiety to Susanna, the wife of Banzer; then Banzer executed a will disposing of his property in these words: “First after all my lawful debts are paid and discharged I give aud bequeath to my beloved wife, Susanna Banzer, all my real and personal estate now at present and hereafter in my possession; my real estate consisting at present of a part of a house known by the number 220 West Thirty-second street, Twentieth Ward, so as described in the deed of said house; and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roseboom v. . RoseboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Stelz v. . ShreckNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Campbell v. . BeaumontNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Clarke v. . LeuppNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API