Legal Opinion

Maroni v. Paitson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 14, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action under Dram-Shop Act. Appeal from the'Circuit Court of Williarpson county; the Hon. Alonzo K. Vickers, Judge; presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1906/

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Creighton

This was an action based on section 9 of the Dram-Shop Act, by appellee against appellants, to recover damages for injury to her means of support caused by the death of her husband in consequence of his intoxication caused by intoxicating liquors sold him by appellants. Trial by jury. Verdict and judgment in-favor- of appellee for $1,000.

The declaration is in the usual form for such cases, and the defendant pleaded the general issue.

The evidence tends to prove every material allegation of the declaration, and the case appears to be in every respect a complete and meritorious case.

Counsel .for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. Waukegan & Southwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. MeehanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898
  3. Conlon v. ManningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  4. Rosin v. WildeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  5. Marsh v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McAllister & Schroeder v. Weber Motor Car Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  2. Kozowski v. OstrowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API