Legal Opinion

Mullins v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1980No. 4362PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

This is a speedy trial case under Alaska R.Crim.P. 45.1 The precise question presented is whether a three-month delay in appellant’s trial was excludable under Rule 45(d), when that delay was occasioned by the state’s decision to try appellant Jimmy Mullins’ co-defendant first, so that he would be available to testify against Mullins.

*766Mullins and Billy Joe Howe were arrested on December 27, 1977, for their alleged robbery early that morning of a grocery store in Chugiak, near Anchorage. The omnibus hearing for both Mullins and Howe was set for January 30, 1978, and a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. United States v. Urban J. Didier, A/K/A "Harp,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Peterkin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Batey v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Westdahl v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Russell v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
  2. Velez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  4. Mullins v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. R.H.Court of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API