Mullins v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
This is a speedy trial case under Alaska R.Crim.P. 45.1 The precise question presented is whether a three-month delay in appellant’s trial was excludable under Rule 45(d), when that delay was occasioned by the state’s decision to try appellant Jimmy Mullins’ co-defendant first, so that he would be available to testify against Mullins.
*766Mullins and Billy Joe Howe were arrested on December 27, 1977, for their alleged robbery early that morning of a grocery store in Chugiak, near Anchorage. The omnibus hearing for both Mullins and Howe was set for January 30, 1978, and a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peterson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Urban J. Didier, A/K/A "Harp,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Peterkin v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Batey v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Westdahl v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Russell v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
- Velez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Mullins v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. R.H.Court of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.