Legal Opinion

Barbera v. DeRostaing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In view of the plaintiffs’ failure to provide any reasonable excuse for their extensive delay in serving their bill of particulars, their failure to comply with the court’s conditional order of preclusion, and their failure to submit an affidavit of merit, the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted unconditionally and the complaint dismissed (see, La Buda v Brookhaven Mem. Hosp. Med. Center, 98 AD2d 711, affd 62 NY2d 1014; Bailey v North Shore Univ. Hosp., 91 AD2d 967, affd 59 NY2d 748). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Eiber and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Buda v. Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. La Buda v. Brookhaven Memorial Hospital Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Bailey v. North Shore University HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bailey v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garten v. MazlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997