Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Hastings Express Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1938No. 24665. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This is an appeal from the municipal court of Chicago to review a judgment of that court finding appellants guilty of the violation of section 2063 of the municipal ordinances of the city of Chicago, hereinafter referred to as the “wheel tax” ordinance, and assessing a fine of $25. The trial judge has certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance is involved and that, in his opinion, the cause should be appealed directly to this court.

The facts as stipulated are, in substance, that the defendant the Hastings Express Company, a corporation, is authorized by its charter to engage in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bullman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Kizer v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. City of Geneseo v. Illinois Northern Utilities Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Roe v. City of JacksonvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Geneseo v. Illinois Northern Utilities Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rozner v. KorshakIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. City of MorgantownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. City of Chicago v. Willett Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API