Legal Opinion

People v. Chambers

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1992No. Docket 90505PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented by the defendant’s delayed application for leave to appeal is whether a person whose conviction has been reversed or otherwise set aside, but who nonetheless remains in the custody of the Department of Corrections, is subject to the 180-day rule of MCL 780.131; MSA 28.969(1) and MCL 780.133; MSA 28.969(3). The circuit court and the Court of Appeals have held that the rule does not apply to such a defendant. We affirm.

I

A seven-count felony information 1 was filed against defendant on December 18, 1984. Initially, defendant pleaded guilty of assault with intent to commit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. LeroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. PixlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. HolbrookMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. McLaughlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Love v. FicanoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  3. People v. PerezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API