People v. Chambers
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The question presented by the defendant’s delayed application for leave to appeal is whether a person whose conviction has been reversed or otherwise set aside, but who nonetheless remains in the custody of the Department of Corrections, is subject to the 180-day rule of MCL 780.131; MSA 28.969(1) and MCL 780.133; MSA 28.969(3). The circuit court and the Court of Appeals have held that the rule does not apply to such a defendant. We affirm.
I
A seven-count felony information 1 was filed against defendant on December 18, 1984. Initially, defendant pleaded guilty of assault with intent to commit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. LeroyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. PixlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WalkerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. HolbrookMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. McLaughlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Love v. FicanoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- People v. PerezMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003