Watson v. Damon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Third District Court. McKee, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 1, Morrison, C. J.:
The complaint in this case alleges that on the 15th day of March, 1876, the defendant entered into a verbal contract with the plaintiff, by the terms of which plaintiff was to furnish the necessary materials, and to build a dwelling-house for the defendant on a certain lot in the city of Oakland, according to a certain plan and specifications; said house to be completed within sixty days, for the stipulated sum or price of $2,250 in gold coin. Plaintiff avers performance on his part,' and claims a balance due him of $1,350.
Defendant denies specifically all…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Terry v. SicklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sonnesyn v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Fiore v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. LemckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Vargas v. RuggieroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- O'Connell v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.