Legal Opinion

State v. Sedillo

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2001No. 20,398PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PICKARD, Chief Judge.

{1} The practice of law in the metropolitan, municipal, and magistrate courts of this state is often conducted with a certain degree of informality. The question we address in this case is whether an order in the form of a judge’s handwritten notations is sufficient to prove prior convictions for driving while intoxicated (DWI). We hold that a fact finder is permitted, but not required, to find the fact of a prior conviction where, as here, the prior conviction is proved by a judge’s handwritten abbreviations on a complaint. A defendant is, of course, permitted to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. LarranagaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. O'NEILNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. DuncanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. DawsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. LohbergerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. BullcomingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API