State v. Sedillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Chief Judge.
{1} The practice of law in the metropolitan, municipal, and magistrate courts of this state is often conducted with a certain degree of informality. The question we address in this case is whether an order in the form of a judge’s handwritten notations is sufficient to prove prior convictions for driving while intoxicated (DWI). We hold that a fact finder is permitted, but not required, to find the fact of a prior conviction where, as here, the prior conviction is proved by a judge’s handwritten abbreviations on a complaint. A defendant is, of course, permitted to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LarranagaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. O'NEILNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. DuncanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. DawsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FosterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. LohbergerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. BullcomingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.