Legal Opinion

State of Maine v. David Bradley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 10, 2016No. Docket Ken-15-266PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphrey, J.

[¶ 1] David Bradley appeals the restitution portion of his sentence arising from his conviction for submitting hundreds of fraudulent claims to MaineCare. He contends (1) that the court erred in finding that he was not incapable of paying the ordered restitution, and (2) that the court’s decision to order $20,000 in restitution was so arbitrary that it violated his right to due process of law. Discerning no error or due process violation, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] David Bradley was charged with one count of theft by deception (Class B), 17-A M.R.S. § 354(1)(B)(1) (2015) on June 12, 2013,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RickerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  2. State of Maine v. Thomas BennettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  3. State v. BerubeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. State of Maine v. Julia PeckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Richard J. Murray-BurnsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  2. State of Maine v. William C. PlanteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  3. State v. PlanteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API