Legal Opinion

Claim of Seeger v. Moduform, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1989PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Mercure, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 13, 1987, which held Moduform, Inc. liable for contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and other persons similarly situated.

Claimant was a sales representative for Moduform, Inc., from November 1984 until his discharge in April 1986. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed the determination of an Administrative Law Judge and sustained that of the Commissioner of Labor that claimant and other persons who performed services for Moduform under similar circumstances were its employees.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hecht v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. In re the Claim of HarperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. In re the Claim of KokoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re the Claim of KennardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. In re the Claim of OrellanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claim of Emanatian v. Saratoga Springs Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of AcabeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re the Claim of CobrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. In re the Claim of EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Barber v. New York State Office of Victim ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API